arrow_back_ios
Tense Agreement: Past + Relative Pronoun + Imperfect
arrow_forward_ios

Tense agreement in French follows precise rules that ensure the coherence and clarity of verb tenses within a sentence. This harmonization of tenses is particularly important in complex sentences, where a main clause in the past is followed by a relative clause. Tense agreement then becomes automatic and systematic, adhering to well-established principles to indicate the simultaneity or continuity of actions over time.
Principle of Automatic Agreement

When the main clause is expressed in the past (passé composé, imparfait, plus-que-parfait), the verb in the following relative clause with a relative pronoun (qui, que, où, dont) is generally in the imperfect. This rule reflects the simultaneity or recurrence of an action or state in relation to the main action.

  • Il dit qu’il va bien. ➡️ Il a dit qu’il allait bien. (passé composé) (He says he's fine. ➡️ He said he was fine.)
  • Il pense que c’est intéressant. ➡️ Il pensait que c’était intéressant. (imparfait) (He thinks it's interesting. ➡️ He thought it was interesting.)
  • Il répond que ce n’est pas vrai. ➡️ Il avait répondu que ce n’était pas vrai. (plus-que-parfait) (He responds that it isn't true. ➡️ He had responded that it wasn't true.)
  • Je t'ai dit que ce film était bien. (I told you that this movie was good.)
  • Je te disais que ce film était bien. (I was telling you that this movie was good.)
  • Je t'avais dit que ce film était bien. (I had told you that this movie was good.)
Importance of the Rule

Knowing and applying the tense agreement rule is crucial for:

  • Ensuring temporal coherence within a text.
  • Avoiding confusion that could arise from incorrect use of tenses.
  • Improving the clarity and precision of written and spoken expression.